Camera Sensor Size Comparison
Compare different camera sensor formats visually. See how Full Frame, APS-C, Micro Four Thirds, and other sensor sizes compare in real dimensions, crop factors, and field of view differences.
Compare different camera sensor formats visually. See how Full Frame, APS-C, Micro Four Thirds, and other sensor sizes compare in real dimensions, crop factors, and field of view differences.
Camera sensor size directly affects image quality, depth of field, low-light performance, and lens field of view. Larger sensors typically capture more light, provide better dynamic range, and allow for shallower depth of field effects.
Crop factor describes how much smaller a sensor is compared to full frame (35mm). A 1.5x crop factor means the sensor captures a narrower field of view, effectively "cropping" the image. This affects the equivalent focal length of your lenses.
Full Frame (36×24mm) is the standard reference. APS-C sensors are smaller with 1.5-1.6x crop factors, while Micro Four Thirds has a 2x crop factor. Each format has advantages in size, weight, lens selection, and image characteristics.
Cinema cameras like ARRI ALEXA and RED cameras often use specialized sensor formats optimized for filmmaking, while photography cameras typically use standard formats. Super 35mm is the cinema standard, roughly equivalent to APS-C in photography.
Consider your photography style, budget, and portability needs. Full frame excels in low light and shallow DOF. APS-C offers a good balance of quality and size. Micro Four Thirds provides excellent portability with extensive lens options.
Sensor size affects the effective focal length of your lenses due to crop factor. A 50mm lens on APS-C behaves like a 75-80mm lens on full frame. This can be advantageous for telephoto work but limiting for wide-angle photography.